Antivirus Performance Comparison

http://www.avastantivirusreview.com/avast-vpn-vs-nordvpn-expectations-vs-reality

When selecting an antivirus program it is crucial to understand the amount of your computer’s resources this program will use. The most effective software will have minimal impact on performance of your system but still offer excellent protection against malware and viruses.

Most antivirus software providers publish comprehensive test programs in PDF format. The reports provide at-a-glance assessments of protection, performance and usability for each suite, along with detailed graphs and charts illustrating the results of specific test elements. Important figures to look for include the percentage of real-world or reference set malware vulnerabilities that are blocked, neutralised or weakened by the software, as well as the percentage of false positive detections for benign software.

In AV-Comparatives’ tests from June 2023, Avast Free Antivirus for Mac had the highest percentage of pass rates in blocking Mac malware and PUAs (potentially unwanted programs) and the second-highest score for Windows virus detection. It also scored high in the passive, full-scan and quick-scan categories.

In the category of paid programs, Bitdefender Total Security had the lightest post-installation background system impact which was followed by Kaspersky Total Security and ESET Security Cloud Free. However, it was the slowest in the full-scan and quick-scan categories. The slight background impact could be due to the fact that the program does not run by default on Windows 10 and 11, as its competitors do.

Intego X10 has the lowest overall system impact on the background and full scan and yet managed to find every single piece of malware tested. It’s rare to find a company that solely focuses on Macs. This makes it a valuable option for any security arsenal.